“One of the most interesting cases of haunting in London is or was
associated with the mummy cases of a high priestess of the Temple of
Amen-Ra,” begins the entry in Peter Underwood’s Haunted London (1974.)
It does seem indisputable that from the time the mummy case passed into the possession of an Englishman in Egypt about 1860 a strange series of fatalities followed its journey and even when it resided in the Mummy Room at the British Museum, sudden death haunted those who handled the 3,500-year-old relic from Luxor.
Ah, nothing stirs the hackles on the back of an Englishman’s neck than the tale of the Mummy’s curse.
Although it’s not marked at such, the most famous cursed mummy case
of all has stood for much of the last century in the First Egyptian Room
at the British Museum.
The yarn begins with an Oxford graduate, published author, horse
breeder and amateur archaeologist named Thomas Douglas Murray
(1841-1911), who had been visiting Cairo since 1866. Sometime around
1889, he and two colleagues were shown a remarkably well-preserved mummy
case by an Arab, supposedly excavated in the 1880s. The hieroglyphics
described the owner as a high priestess of Amen-Ra.
Murray and his friends drew lots to determine which of them would buy
it – Murray won, completed the sale and the case was packed up and on
its way to his home in London the same evening.
A few days later, Murray’s shotgun exploded while he was
duck-shooting on the Nile. Tremendous headwinds hampered his progress
back from Thebes to Cairo to seek medical treatment, meaning it was ten
days before he could get medical attention. By that time, gangrene had
set in and Murray’s arm had to be amputated.
On the return journey to Cairo, one of his companions died, while, according to Montague Summers’ Witchcraft and Black Magic,
“the most distressing news was awaiting another member of the
expedition. Two servants who had handled the mummy case, perhaps without
sufficient respect, both died within a twelvemonth, whilst a far
swifter fate overtook a third who had made some jesting sally.”
Back in the hall of his London home at 34 Portland Place, Murray found the mummy case unpacked.
At once, he found the object chilling and ominous, the formerly beautiful face on the board now seeming full of malevolence.
One source claims that Madame Blavatsky, the clairvoyant founder of
Theospophy, “detected an evil influence” from the case when she visited
the house.
Madame Blavatsky |
A journalist profiling Murray asked to borrow the board, and Murray
found himself relieved when it left his house. Misfortune struck the
journalist while it was in her possession – her mother fell downstairs
and died, her fiancé called off their relationship, her dogs went mad
and she became ill. She told her lawyer that she believed the mummy case
was unsettling her, so it was returned to Murray.
Rattled, he gave it to his friend, Mr Wheeler, “who very shortly
experienced several sad reverses, and died not long afterwards
broken-hearted. He had given the case to a married sister living near
London, and from the day it entered her house this lady was pursued by
troubles and sorrows which it is hardly necessary to detail.”
Wheeler’s sister took the case to be photographed at a studio in
Baker Street, and to her horror, “when the plate was developed, although
the negative had not been touched in any way, it was seen that there
looked out the face of a living Egyptian woman whose eyes stared
furiously with an expression of singular malevolence. In the course of a
few weeks the photographer died suddenly and in most mysterious
circumstances.” It was said that when a later owner of one of the
photographs brought it into his home, every piece of glass in his home
shattered.
The lady who had taken possession of the case happened to meet
Murray, “and naturally poured out to him her pitiful story. He urged her
to get rid of the case immediately, whereupon it was offered to and
accepted by the British Museum.”
An Egyptologist who acted as the middleman in the handover had the
case sent to his house so he could study the hieroglyphics – he died
shortly after, his servant saying his master hadn’t slept since the day
the coffin was brought into the house.
The carrier who brought the case to the British Museum died within a
week, and it was rumoured that anyone who tried to photograph or sketch
the mummy case would be struck down. Another photographer who had taken
an image capturing the terrifying face of a woman shot himself after
presenting it to Sir Ernest Wallis Budge, the Keeper of Egyptian and
Assyrian Antiquities at the British Museum.
Wallis Budge was reportedly so concerned with the number of stories
he had heard – numerous staff reported unexplained hammering noises and
raucous sobs coming from the case – he began to wonder if the priestess
was unhappy with her position and presentation in the Museum. He
arranged for the mummy to be installed in a display case of its own
adorned with a laudatory notice. It was said the disturbances largely
ebbed away once this was done – although night cleaning staff continued
to report ghostly appearances and overwhelming feelings of terror
emanating from the case in the decades to come.
Wallis Budge, who had translated the Egyptian Book of the Dead,
was even quoted as saying, enigmatically, “Never print what I saw in my
lifetime, but the mummy case of Princess Amen-Ra caused the war.”
Nor did Murray’s problems stop when he had rid himself of the case –
he was reportedly lost a large part of his fortune over the following
years and died in 1912.
But like any good ghost story, the truth is both more prosaic and harder to locate than the myth.
Douglas Murray was indeed at the heart of the tale of the Cursed
Mummy Case – but he was neither the intrepid traveller nor the reliable
witness he might have seemed.
In 1889, Murray was part of a large movement of people becoming
interested in the paranormal. At a time when séances, table tapping and
communicating with the other side were terrifically en vogue, he was not
unusual. But like many of the spiritualists at the time, his desire to
find the existence of an afterlife came at the expense of the truth.
At some point prior to his dabblings with the mummy board, Murray had
heard a popular story about an Englishwoman who had brought a mummy
from Egypt which was displayed in her drawing room. The next morning,
everything in the room was found smashed into pieces. She moved the
mummy and the same thing happened again. When it was taken up to the
attic, all night long the sound of heavy footsteps going up and down the
stairs were heard, accompanied by strange flickering lights. The
following morning, all the servants resigned. It was a story that
captured Murray’s imagination.
When Mr A.F. Wheeler presented to the British Museum “the inner mummy
case of a Princess of Amen and a member of the college of Amen-Ra at
Thebes” on behalf of Mrs Warwick Hunt of Holland Park in 1890, Murray
contacted the museum to ask if he could hold a séance in the Egyptian
Room with his colleague, the journalist WT Stead (who wrote one of the
first articles about the ‘curse’).
WT Stead (1849-1912) |
The men had studied the coffin lid, and “felt the expression on the
face of the cover was that of a living soul in torment.” As recounted by
Budge, “they wished to hold a séance in a room and to perform certain
experiments with the object of removing the anguish and misery from the
eyes of the coffin-lid.”
Murray was turned down, but the papers reported the story (most
likely through Stead’s contacts), mixing together the abortive séance,
the creaky old ghost story, the coffin lid and Douglas Murray into a
composite nonsense tale that’s survived for a century.
In some ways, Stead gave the whole story credence – one of the
forefathers of modern investigative journalism, he was famously jailed
following his landmark investigation into child prostitution, when he
arranged the ‘purchase’ of a 13-year-old to prove that the trade
existed.
Combative, creative and a pacificist frequently nominated for the
Nobel Peace Prize, Stead became increasingly interested in spiritualism
during the 1890s, claiming he was receiving messages from the dead. He
believed he had a spirit guide, in the form of an American temperance
campaigner named Julia Ames, who he had met shortly before her death.
His absorption in spiritualism began to dominate his writings, and
marginalised what had once been a massive influential talent.
In 1912, Stead inadvertently added a further dimension to the tale – he was one of the victims onboard the Titanic.
After the ship struck the iceberg, Stead helped several women and
children into the lifeboats, in an act “typical of his generosity,
courage, and humanity.” After all the boats had gone, Stead went into
the 1st Class Smoking Room, where he was last seen sitting in a leather
chair and reading a book. He had been due to take part in a Peace
Congress at Carnegie Hall at the special invitation of President Taft;
it was said that had he survived, he would have received Nobel Peace
Prize later that year.
Stead’s death led to a resurgence of rumours about the case when one
survivor related he had told the story of the mummy’s curse onboard.
It was claimed the British Museum had reached the end of their tether
with the unexplained goings-on, and had sold the board to an American
museum – the case was being exported on the doomed ship’s maiden voyage
and the curse had caused the sinking. One version of the story had the
board being salvaged after the disaster, and continuing to cause mayhem
as it travelled to new owners in Canada, being responsible for the
sinking of the Empress of Ireland in the St Lawrence River.
The truth was actually far less elaborate: the case was on display in the British Museum, just as it always had been.
When I contacted the British Museum, I received an email back from Dr
Julie Anderson, the Assistant Keeper in the Department of Ancient Egypt
and Sudan, who enclosed a leaflet about the ‘Unlucky Mummy.’
The painted and gessoed (the coating which prepares the wood for
painting) inner coffin lid made to cover the mummy of a woman was
discovered in Thebes, dating to the 21st or early 22nd
Dynasty (c.950-900 BC.) Standing 162cm tall, little is known of the
coffin’s owner, other than the fine work on the board suggests she was a
person of high rank, although the mummy associated with the board is
believed to have been left in Egypt. Ascribing her royal status, or
claiming she was a priestess (as Budge did) is simply supposition based
on a reading of the high quality of the board, a conclusion which
today’s experts tend to disagree with.
The board has been on continuous display in the British Museum since
1890 – it has only left on a handful of occasions, when moved for
safekeeping during the two World Wars and in 1990, when it formed part
of a temporary exhibition in Australia.
The New York Times debunked the story as early as 1923,
saying “the public proceeded to identify the Priestess of Amen-Ra with
the crockery-smashing mummy of the suburban drawing room. People have
written from so far afield as New Zealand and Algiers enclosing money to
place lilies at the foot of the coffin lid. The money has been
acknowledged, but it has been put to the much more prosaic use of the
general upkeep of the museum.”
In 1934, Wallis Budge even issued a statement saying the British
Museum had never possessed a mummy, coffin or cover that had been
involved in any unusual events. He stated the case had never been sold
by the terrified Museum, had never been on the Titanic and had never
left the museum at any point since its arrival (aside from a brief
period when it was stored in the basement during the First World War).
That said, Wallis Budge died in the same year he made his statement,
so if he was hiding the truth, perhaps the vengeful mummy had one last
burst of malevolence left…
One source claimed every part of Douglas Murray’s story was entirely
fabricated, but in truth, he did seem to have some part in handling the
board before it ended up in the British Museum’s collection. Some
sources claim he bought the lid from an American millionaire collector
of antiquities named James Carnegie, the patron of the famous German
archaeologist Heinrich Schliemann (1822-1890), who may have discovered
it at a dig in the late 1880s
Heinrich Schliemann |
Carnegie may have sold the coffin lid to Douglas Murray in Cairo in
1910 (the popular ‘curse’ rumour being he died of cancer before the
Englishman’s cheque even cleared.) Quite how the case ended up passing
from Murray into the hands of Mrs Hunt is unexplained.
But he real mystery is why did Douglas Murray promote the story of a curse?
He was in his forties, established and seemingly had no need to
promote himself. By the time his story was known, the mummy had already
been bequeathed to the Museum so he wouldn’t even have financially
benefitted from its unique back-story.
It seems most likely that his Spiritualist beliefs led him to claim
the coffin he had bought was in some way haunted. If it was an attempt
to capture the imaginations of those who did not believe in the
paranormal, he succeeded in a way he could never have envisaged; over
120 years later, his ghost story is still doing the rounds.
Thomas Douglas Murray died in 1912, his will founding a scholarship
in Egyptology which still exists at UCL (a legacy which contradicts the
claim he was bankrupt at the end of his life, part of the ongoing
curse.) Aside from having his name attached to one of the country’s most
enduring ghost stories, Douglas Murray was also the man who first
brought the Pekinese Spaniel to Britain
Today, the Mummy-board EA 22542 has just been returned from loan, but
has not yet been returned to display. It will soon be back in its usual
place: Gallery 62, case 21